The optimism symbol drops by 40%, which raises calls to exclude trucks from droplets

The optimism symbol drops by 40%, which raises calls to exclude trucks from droplets – Mail Bonus

The recently launched governing body of Optimism, OP, has fallen by 40% since reaching a high of $ 2.10, which led members of the community to talk about banning those who dropped their tokens from future flights.

Cointelegraph reported on Tuesday that the Ethereum lag-2 scale solution was overwhelmed by demand for the first OP droplet control symbols, where 5% of the identification supply was distributed to about 250,000 eligible users.

According to CoinGecko data, the symbol opened at approx. $ 1.43 before rising to $ 2.10, but as more users got their hands on the free drop of air during the day, OP dropped to $ 1.09 before returning to $ 1.18 at the time of writing. . 43% reduction.

Following a sharp drop in OP prices, a member of the management community of Optimism, hosted by OxJohn, proposed in Optimism’s cabinet forum to exclude addresses that dropped 100% of their flight tokens. The post attracted a lot of community attention, 11,200 views, 305 replies and 595 likes.

OxJohn identified several addresses that received at least 32,000 OP tokens and immediately put them on the market, arguing that their actions were “consequential” to the community and diluted the management process.

OP hodler went on to suggest that these bills should be excluded from the next round of OP airdrops with the “official list of bills involved in this behavior” excluded. In their view, it would only redistribute the importance of governance to those who intend to take an active part.

“Why should Optimism Collective continue to reward such mercenaries who will throw away their symbols at first sight? Why should all future airports reward these addresses? “

The proposal was submitted for ideas and comments only and is not close to being voted on. The government’s response has been mixed so far. Some users were completely in favor, others rejected the idea altogether and some called for a more nuanced stance.

User Mohammedt75 said: “Very valid points. Encourage people who care about the long term and let others who care about the ecosystem pack up and get out. ”

Mgomes said that “one of the goals of the airport is to encourage people to use the chain. “Even if they’re going to throw it away, it’s okay, because they have used optimism and if they liked the chain, they will continue to use it.”

Member JustinMarx also pointed out an interesting counterbalance, saying that trucks should not be punished as “you never know the personal circumstances of someone who fits their symbols.

One of the prominent Crypto Twitter users to weigh in was Cobie, co-host UpOnly crypto podcast that has nearly 700,000 followers. He responded to the proposal in his typical mocking / mocking way.

Cobie made a lengthy counter-proposal on the forum, entitled “Extended Air Drop Capability in the Future” which was temporarily removed because it was flagged as “inappropriate” but has since been re-posted.

He said that “my lack of support for this proposal is not because I disagree with the view. On the contrary, it is because this proposal does not go far enough. ”

“I suggest that we, the Optimism Collective, cancel future missiles of all those who have sold any tokens in the last 6 months. These people have undesirable behavior, we can look at them as “potential future sellers”.

To counter potential future sellers, Cobie suggested issuing bonds and also considering “physical violence”.

However, after being asked to give a more serious response to the proposal, Cobie pointed out some reasons why he thinks it is a bad idea.

Connected: ETH / USD trading pair attracts more traders in first quarter 2022: Report

He pointed out points such as the fact that early OP prices did not matter, sellers had different incentives, the ability to sell and still participate in management practices, the symbol was used as part of Optimism’s purchase cost and how easy it is to create a new address. to avoid restrictions.

“The only people who care are price speculators, traders and short-term investors. Governance certainly works the same whether the price is $ 1.50 or $ 2. Certainly, large-scale price changes could make attacks on Bjartsýn cheaper, but this is not even mentioned in the original proposal. “

“And it’s not really a concern given the size of the airfield or the short-term nature of the sales pressure from ‘eyewear’s,” he added.