Why distributed messaging will replace social media today

Why distributed messaging will replace social media today – Mail Bonus

The Russian government has taken action against foreign social media such as Instagram, Facebook and Twitter and banned them from extremist activists. For protesters, activists and local citizens, these actions have led to a significant barrier to communication with the outside world. Furthermore, they have also raised the question of how easy it is for the government to target these apps. Since citizens can not access these systems, they have little choice but to flee to the next best yet active platforms.

However, it is not just Russian activists who have chosen other options. Take, for example, Telegram, a cloud-based chat service that has quickly become a place to share war images and other content that might otherwise have been blocked on forums like Instagram or Twitter. Not to mention that even these platforms, which are available to citizens now, have no guarantee of being free from government bans. In this case, users will have no choice but to turn to “home-made” options developed locally.

The debate between freedom and control is not new, as the current situation in the world is just one example of when these divisions are head to head. Previously, this discussion was introduced by the Internet providing digital freedom, where high technology uses metadata to take advantage of opportunities and concerns of governments that use the same data to keep an eye on their citizens. The bottom line is that privacy and freedom of speech will never be guaranteed under the modern Web 2 foundation.

The struggle between freedom and governance is still ongoing as the world unleashes new ways to strengthen individual sovereignty. For this reason, movements will always have weaknesses that are easy to target and protest activities will continue to face obstacles as long as they rely on centralized social media, which can be shut down at any time. Of course, this calls for example the situation that arose when the Nigerian government banned Twitter to protect its people from political action against the government. This action really only stifled activities and limited the citizens’ ability to communicate freely and organize.

Taking a community-driven approach

As a result, social movements are now disappearing from having one leader, taking power from one party and distributing power among the people who form the movement. Evidence of this diffuse approach can now be seen in movements such as the Extinction Rebellion and Occupy Wall Street.

This idea of ​​giving power back to the people is far from new. With the advent of the internet and mobile devices, power is placed directly in the hands of the user. After all, anyone can record, create, or distribute information to millions of people in a matter of seconds. Power is actually distributed to the world, which allows even the citizen with the smallest voice to have the most influence. Therefore, rather than being ‘leaderless’, movements towards decentralization are empowering new leaders in a way that allows anyone to rally and take action on the most pressing concerns in their community.

Although the Internet has proven to be the best source of information, its technical design is not perfect. Therefore, while technology will always be at the heart of how activists operate and communicate with the outside world, the right protocols and infrastructure are needed to ensure that efforts are not stifled.

Therefore, platforms for decentralized communication have proved to be the most suitable option for activists and protesters to come together without fear of systemic shutdowns. Unfortunately, in order to make these offers accessible, private messengers need a strong distributed ecosystem as a basis.

Making privacy possible

In the decentralization of communications, blockchain technology is considered to play an important role as a starting point for messaging applications. These solutions actually go beyond encryption to add a second level of privacy. Properly covered, it will withstand a great deal of adverse conditions.

One example of this is Oxen, a platform designed to build a private future for the Internet by offering tools and services that enable users to use blockchain networks to achieve privacy in all areas of their daily lives.

To support this, Oxen published Session. Session is a messaging program tailored for activists, protesters and others in dangerous situations. Due to their diffuse nature, these forums make it more difficult for malicious authorities or authorities to block, censor, or monitor the material being exchanged.

In response to these efforts, says Kee Jefferys, Oxen’s Chief Technology Officer, “Session is specifically built for activists. It’s a great messenger for protesters and activities because it’s secure, private, anonymous and decentralized. When you use Session, you can be sure that you can speak freely. “

With Session, activists will have the ability to complete their work peacefully and without interruption. Session has already reached 1,000,000 downloads on Google Play, with over 300,000 active users monthly.

Disclaimer. Cointelegraph does not endorse any material or product on this site. While we aim to provide you with all the important information we could gather, readers should do their own research before taking action related to the company and take full responsibility for their decisions, nor can this article be considered investment advice.

Mail Bonus – #distributed #messaging #replace #social #media #today

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.